I hate to break this to all of you "tree-huggers": We are polluting the air, after all, when we ride our bicycles.
Oh, but it gets worse: the more and harder we ride, the more we fill the atmosphere with a toxin--namely, carbon dioxide.
Now, I'll admit that I haven't taken a science class since, well, before some of you were born. But the notion that we are fouling the air when we pedal and puff is at least factually and etymologically true--at least in the same sense as another statement made by no less of an environmental scientist than Ronald Reagan. Back in 1981, he said, "Trees cause more pollution than automobiles do."
Would you expect any less from the man who appointed James G. Watt as his Secretary of the Interior?
Apparently, Washington State Representative Ed Orcutt learned his science from Professor Ronnie. Hey, if I had science professors like him, I'd be nominated for a Nobel Prize. In what, I don't know.
But I digress. The Hon. Rep. Orcutt revealed his epoch-making discovery about cyclists to a bike shop owner during a campaign for a proposal to charge a $25 fee on bicycles costing more than $500. That fee would help to pay for transportation facilities.
Orcutt has since apologized for his remarks. However, the furor over his remarks remains.
For me, learning of this story has had at least one good outcome: I found it on the BicycleLaw.com webpage. I'll be visiting it from now on.
Last week, I was riding down Second Avenue in Manhattan. I'd stopped at 37th Street, where traffic exits the Queens-Midtown Tunnel. Even the most steel-nerved messengers can't cross that steady stream of cars, taxis, SUVs and livery vans without having green signal or being waved through by a traffic cop.
One of those cops, a young African-American with a boyish face, approached me. "Miss!" You're supposed to ride in the bike lane." He pointed across the avenue to it. "You'll be much safer there."
As I was focused on getting through that bottleneck--Below 34th Street, there's usually much less traffic on Second--I didn't argue with him. I've "educated" more than a few police officers and other people in my time; some were receptive but others became more adamant in their assertion that if there is a lane, a cyclist must use it--or, worse,that bikes simply don't belong on the street at all.
So, I crossed over to the lane and, after I passed the last clump of traffic at NYU Medical Center, I moved back into the traffic lane.
I hadn't been riding that line before I saw the cop because the section of it just below the Queensborough (59th Street) Bridge, which I rode into Manhattan, was blocked off. And, when it opened again somewhere around 52nd Street, it didn't appear to be in very good condition. In the last couple of years, there has been a lot of coonstruction along Second, where a new subway line is being built.
Poor surface conditions are just one reason why some of us don't use the bike lanes, at least some of the time. I found this list of other reasons on NYC Bike Commuter:
The bottom line, dear motorist, is that we are in "your" lane because it's often safer for both us and you to be there. In their infinite wisdom, the designers of lanes next curbs have--probably unwittingly--made things less safe for you as well as for us.
From looking at this blog and my bikes, you have probably figured out that my favorite color is purple.
Today, I'm going to write about my first purple bike.
From what I'm told, Antonio Mondonico himself built this bike back in 1992. I got new around Christmas of that year. At that time, many of the Italian "master" builders like Mondonico and Colnago were still building their own bikes, though some were raced with the names of teams or sponsors on them.
This was the fourth Italian bike I owned, if I recall correctly. Although I went through a period in which I would ride nothing but Italian bikes (the Mondonico was part of it), I was never entirely convinced of the Italian mystique, though the bikes I had were quite good.
There were two ways in which this bike stood out from the other Italian bikes I've owned and ridden. One of them is in the finish and details. Some Italian bikes were quite pretty; others were garish (like the Gios, in my opinion) and others simply gaudy. My Mondonico was, I thought, distinctive and surprisingly crisp for a purple Italian bike. The lugwork was very sharp-edged, and the outlines were clear. And, the paint was not only pretty; it seemed to hold up better than the paint on other Italian bikes I had.
The other way this bike distinguished itself--from my other Italian bikes (and, for that matter, other bikes I've owned) is in its handling. If I'm not mistaken, it had slightly steeper angles than other road bikes I've owned. In fact, its geometry was remarkably similar to a track bike I would acquire about a year after I got the Mondonico. A post about that bike is coming soon.
Its geometry meant that this bike was intended for criteriums: the sorts of races in which large numbers of riders pedal through a short course of closed-off city streets. The length of the race is usually determined by the number of laps or the time; in either event, a "crit" typically lasts an hour or less.
The Mondonico had what one might expect of such a bike: quick acceleration and snappy handling. I used to have a lot of fun riding it in Prospect and Central Parks (where I raced it a few times), and on similar kinds of courses. However, it wasn't the most comfortable of bikes on longer rides, even after I changed the seatpost to one with more setback than the one I originally had and fiddled with the saddle position.
Also, the Mondonico was a smaller size (53.5 cm, if I recall correctly) than my previous racing bikes, as I wanted a shorter top tube. However, I think using a longer seat post than I used on previous bikes exacerbated the strain the steep seat angle created on my thigh and shin ligaments. That would also be part of the reason why I would sell this bike after about three and a half years, when I realized that criterium-type races would never be the "main event" of my cycling life.
One other way which this bike is noteworthy, at least for me, is that while it was my first purple bike, it was also the last I rode with tubular (sew-up) tires. In addition to the sew-ups, I had a set of clinchers for this bike; they were the wheels I rode most of the time. When I sold the Mondonico, I also sold my last pair of tubular wheels and tires.
