Two weeks ago, I wrote about something that, I believe, is the most important factor in making a city (or culture) "bike friendly".
Today, I'm going to share some of my ideas about something that could turn more drivers into cyclists and, thus, make a city more "bike friendly": getting more people to ride bikes to work, school and for errands, shopping and other short trips.
As more than a few bloggers, writers, urban planners and others who've thought about the topic (including yours truly) have said, employers as well as governments can offer people incentives to ride their bikes to work. Governments can offer things like tax incentives, both to cyclists (or anyone who doesn't use an automobile) and to employers who encourage their employees to ride to work. Governments could also offer retailers and other small business owners incentives to make it easier to park bikes safely in or around their facilities.
The Federal Commuter Tax Benefit took effect on 1 January 2009. An employee can receive up to $20 a month for riding his or her bike to work if--and this is a big if--the employer offers the benefit. As of now, it's not mandatory. Also, an employee can receive the benefit only if he or she does not receive other transportation benefits in the same month.
Rep. Earl Blumenauer of Oregon has tried to amend the FCTB so bike commuters could receive the transportation benefit and divert the $20 from their own money, rather than asking for it from their employers. Such attempts have been unsuccessful, possibly because most employers who provide transportation benefits do so through a benefit provider, just as they contract for employee health benefits through insurance companies or state plans. Although I have no experience in this area, I imagine that it's harder for an employer to get their providers to change a policy than it is for them to change policies regarding benefits they provide in-house, on their own.
It's obvious how such a benefit can help cyclists both in helping to defray the costs of cycling (which, while far less than automotive commuting, can still add up) and to pay less in taxes. But--again, I speak as a layperson--I should think that employers would like it because, as a pre-tax benefit, it would save them money on taxes as well.
I think governments could do even more. For instance, those who itemize their deductions could be allowed for the expenses incurred while cycling to work, just as automotive (or other vehicle) expenses can be deducted. And, I think greater deductions could be allowed for business owners and employers who offer such things as indoor bicycle parking facilities and facilities in which employees can clean themselves up and change clothes.
As for employers, some interesting and creative suggestions are offered on the website of Muskegon County (Michigan) Ride On! One is offering "starter kits" consisting of items like patch kits, reflective stickers, water bottles and a bike commuter's handbook to employees. Another is making arrangements with local bike shops to offer free or subsidized tune-ups on employees' bikes. Also suggested are having employee groups participate in local cycling events, or for the employers to have such events themselves--as well as recognition for participants as well as those who regularly ride to work. And, perhaps most enticing of all, employees could receive discounts or subsidies on the purchase of bicycles and other bicycle-commuting necessities. Or, employers could provide financing or payroll deductions for such purchases.
Any of these ideas--and greater implementation of tax breaks and monetary benefits for commuting--will do more to get people to ride their bikes to and from work than all of the bike lanes that have ever been built.
Today, I'm going to share some of my ideas about something that could turn more drivers into cyclists and, thus, make a city more "bike friendly": getting more people to ride bikes to work, school and for errands, shopping and other short trips.
As more than a few bloggers, writers, urban planners and others who've thought about the topic (including yours truly) have said, employers as well as governments can offer people incentives to ride their bikes to work. Governments can offer things like tax incentives, both to cyclists (or anyone who doesn't use an automobile) and to employers who encourage their employees to ride to work. Governments could also offer retailers and other small business owners incentives to make it easier to park bikes safely in or around their facilities.
The Federal Commuter Tax Benefit took effect on 1 January 2009. An employee can receive up to $20 a month for riding his or her bike to work if--and this is a big if--the employer offers the benefit. As of now, it's not mandatory. Also, an employee can receive the benefit only if he or she does not receive other transportation benefits in the same month.
Rep. Earl Blumenauer of Oregon has tried to amend the FCTB so bike commuters could receive the transportation benefit and divert the $20 from their own money, rather than asking for it from their employers. Such attempts have been unsuccessful, possibly because most employers who provide transportation benefits do so through a benefit provider, just as they contract for employee health benefits through insurance companies or state plans. Although I have no experience in this area, I imagine that it's harder for an employer to get their providers to change a policy than it is for them to change policies regarding benefits they provide in-house, on their own.
It's obvious how such a benefit can help cyclists both in helping to defray the costs of cycling (which, while far less than automotive commuting, can still add up) and to pay less in taxes. But--again, I speak as a layperson--I should think that employers would like it because, as a pre-tax benefit, it would save them money on taxes as well.
I think governments could do even more. For instance, those who itemize their deductions could be allowed for the expenses incurred while cycling to work, just as automotive (or other vehicle) expenses can be deducted. And, I think greater deductions could be allowed for business owners and employers who offer such things as indoor bicycle parking facilities and facilities in which employees can clean themselves up and change clothes.
As for employers, some interesting and creative suggestions are offered on the website of Muskegon County (Michigan) Ride On! One is offering "starter kits" consisting of items like patch kits, reflective stickers, water bottles and a bike commuter's handbook to employees. Another is making arrangements with local bike shops to offer free or subsidized tune-ups on employees' bikes. Also suggested are having employee groups participate in local cycling events, or for the employers to have such events themselves--as well as recognition for participants as well as those who regularly ride to work. And, perhaps most enticing of all, employees could receive discounts or subsidies on the purchase of bicycles and other bicycle-commuting necessities. Or, employers could provide financing or payroll deductions for such purchases.
Any of these ideas--and greater implementation of tax breaks and monetary benefits for commuting--will do more to get people to ride their bikes to and from work than all of the bike lanes that have ever been built.
