Like many of you, dear readers, I have dreaded this day for the past two months. Longer than that, actually: Unlike those of my friends and acquaintances whose world view was best depicted by a famous New Yorker cover`, I didn't believe Trump's victory "couldn't" or "will never" happen.
Some pundits are counseling us to "wait and see". I wonder whether they actually believe that "it might not be so bad" or they are simply in that kind of denial into which people often descend after accidents, disasters, abuse or other kinds of life-changing truamae.
It may well be true that the Trump presidency (assuming, of course, he makes it through his term) might be very different from what some of us might expect. After all, he holds--or, at least, has expressed--all sorts of contradictory views, and has been known to change them "in a New York minute" or less.
For example, probably no President-elect since Reagan has expressed more disdain for environmental issues--and has been more of a cheerleader for fossil fuel exploitation--than The Orange-ator. (Whatever else you want to say about him, Nixon was more of an environmentalist than any of his successors besides Jimmy Carter. Yes, Obama called attention to climate change and got China to sign onto the Paris accords, but he also pursued policies that exacerbated the environmental effects of domestic energy development and, to a large degree, exported our dirty energy sources.) Given that most cyclists--or, at least, the ones I know--tend to be more environmentally conscious than the average American, one would expect them (us) to be horrified at the prospect of a The Donald in the White House.
Moreover, he has expressed disdain for adult cyclists, especially after John Kerry crashed. He once sniffed that he hasn't ridden a bicycle since he was a kid. After all, real men drive Rolls Royces, right? Actually, no: They hire other people to drive them.
But here's where things get interesting. You see, Trumplethinskin once sponsored a bicycle race. Not any old bike race, mind you: the largest one ever held in this country, at least since the days of the six-day races. The Tour de Trump ran for two editions before he withdrew his sponsorship (citing financial difficulties) and Du Pont took over both the financial obligation and the right to name it after themselves.
Some cursory research (i.e., a glance through Google) confirmed what I'd suspected: since the Tour deTrump/Tour Du Pont ran for the last time, in 1996, there hasn't been another stage race of quite the same stature in the USA. Raul Alcala, who won the second and fifth editions, placed as high as eighth in the Tour de France and seventh in the Vuelta a Espana. The fourth edition of Trump/DuPont was won by a former Tour winner: Greg Lemond. And he who is unmentionable (at least in the cycling world) won the final two editions of Trump/DuPont. In its heyday, the race was even envisioned, by some, as part of a "Grand Slam" that would include the three major European tours and some race or races in Asia.
It's interesting, to say the least, that Trump actually sponsored such an event, however briefly. My research (again on, ahem, Google) indicates that no other President has ever been associated with a bicycle race, whether as a sponsor or participant--even though every President from Eisenhower onward, with the exceptions of Reagan and, ironically, Nixon, cycled during his adult life. Even they, however, never made a point of expressing hostility toward cyclists the way Trump has.
So...What are we to make of the fact that the Inaugural Parade proceeded along a bicycle lane?
The world view of those said it "never could" or "never would" happen. |
Some pundits are counseling us to "wait and see". I wonder whether they actually believe that "it might not be so bad" or they are simply in that kind of denial into which people often descend after accidents, disasters, abuse or other kinds of life-changing truamae.
It may well be true that the Trump presidency (assuming, of course, he makes it through his term) might be very different from what some of us might expect. After all, he holds--or, at least, has expressed--all sorts of contradictory views, and has been known to change them "in a New York minute" or less.
For example, probably no President-elect since Reagan has expressed more disdain for environmental issues--and has been more of a cheerleader for fossil fuel exploitation--than The Orange-ator. (Whatever else you want to say about him, Nixon was more of an environmentalist than any of his successors besides Jimmy Carter. Yes, Obama called attention to climate change and got China to sign onto the Paris accords, but he also pursued policies that exacerbated the environmental effects of domestic energy development and, to a large degree, exported our dirty energy sources.) Given that most cyclists--or, at least, the ones I know--tend to be more environmentally conscious than the average American, one would expect them (us) to be horrified at the prospect of a The Donald in the White House.
Moreover, he has expressed disdain for adult cyclists, especially after John Kerry crashed. He once sniffed that he hasn't ridden a bicycle since he was a kid. After all, real men drive Rolls Royces, right? Actually, no: They hire other people to drive them.
But here's where things get interesting. You see, Trumplethinskin once sponsored a bicycle race. Not any old bike race, mind you: the largest one ever held in this country, at least since the days of the six-day races. The Tour de Trump ran for two editions before he withdrew his sponsorship (citing financial difficulties) and Du Pont took over both the financial obligation and the right to name it after themselves.
Some cursory research (i.e., a glance through Google) confirmed what I'd suspected: since the Tour deTrump/Tour Du Pont ran for the last time, in 1996, there hasn't been another stage race of quite the same stature in the USA. Raul Alcala, who won the second and fifth editions, placed as high as eighth in the Tour de France and seventh in the Vuelta a Espana. The fourth edition of Trump/DuPont was won by a former Tour winner: Greg Lemond. And he who is unmentionable (at least in the cycling world) won the final two editions of Trump/DuPont. In its heyday, the race was even envisioned, by some, as part of a "Grand Slam" that would include the three major European tours and some race or races in Asia.
It's interesting, to say the least, that Trump actually sponsored such an event, however briefly. My research (again on, ahem, Google) indicates that no other President has ever been associated with a bicycle race, whether as a sponsor or participant--even though every President from Eisenhower onward, with the exceptions of Reagan and, ironically, Nixon, cycled during his adult life. Even they, however, never made a point of expressing hostility toward cyclists the way Trump has.
So...What are we to make of the fact that the Inaugural Parade proceeded along a bicycle lane?