I'll admit that on one or two--okay, maybe a couple more--all right, a few more--occasions, I went for a bike ride instead of something I "should" have done.
Mind you, I never skipped out on anything vital. I only played hooky from meetings and other events that written or unwritten protocols recommended or advised.
Oh, and I'll admit that I missed a life event or two, but not of anybody who was particularly close or important to me. And, all right, here's my big confession: I actually skipped out on somebody's "big day"
The ceremony I missed was for a friend-of-a-friend-of-a-friend of an acquaintance, or something like that. And, as I recall, I didn't receive a formal invitation, only a verbal one. I'm not sure that anyone noticed I wasn't there.
On the other hand, I still recall that ride (with Jonathan) many years later.
In a couple of earlier posts (See here and here, I examined some of the ways in which the new tariffs on Chinese goods could affect cyclists and the bike business here in the US.
Some American bike firms, like Brooklyn Bicycle Company, are deciding whether to absorb the price increases or pass them on to customers. Others, like Detroit Bikes and BCA, are calling for even higher tariffs and extending them to all imported bikes.
Trek and Kent--two bike companies rarely mentioned in the same breath, let alone the same blog post!--are contemplating yet another strategy which, really, shouldn't come as much of a surprise.
Trek is, arguably, the most prestigious mass-market American bike brand. (Specialized and Cannondale are probably Trek's chief competitors for this title.) Their highest-priced bikes are still made here, albeit with imported components. The rest of their bikes are made by sub-contractors that include Giant, which also sells its bikes under its own name.
Kent's offerings, in contrast, are at the bottom of the market and found, not in bike shops, but in big-box stores like Walmart and internet retailers. Some are sold, under license, bearing the Jeep, Cadillac and GMC brands. Although some of its bikes are assembled in South Carolina, their frames are made in China and Taiwan and assembled with components made in those countries.
So...Is Trek returning to its roots by returning its manufacturing to the US? Well...no. You're not going to see a revival of those nice lugged steel frames they made in Wisconsin during the '70's and '80's.
Likewise, Kent isn't going to build a factory in Parsippany, New Jersey (the location of its headquarters), or anywhere else in the good ol' You-Ess-Of-Ay!
No, they are not going to do what El Cheeto Grande told all of those laid-off blue-collar workers in Ohio and Michigan and Pennsylvania companies would do in the face of tariffs. Instead of making their wares in the country Trump thinks he can Make Great Again, they are talking about shifting their production to a country that isn't getting a tariff wall built around it.
If you are European, what I am about to say next will come as no surprise: That country is Cambodia.
The Southeast Asian kingdom is already the biggest supplier of bicycles to European Union countries. Most of the country's bike factories are in the north, near Vietnam--which some have called "the EU's China." If you buy, say, a backpack or jacket in Europe, it's more likely than not to have been made in Vietnam, just as the new bike is likely to be from Cambodia.
It will be interesting to see whether other American bike companies make similar moves. If anything, wages in Cambodia, Vietnam and other countries in the region are lower than they are in China. And some Cambodian bikes are already coming into the US--though, in far smaller numbers than bikes from China or Taiwan.
Getting arrested is generally not a good thing. At least, that's what I'm assuming: I haven't suffered the indignity myself, though I've come close!
I must confess that I can feel a bit self-righteous, even smug, when I recall that the times I almost found myself in the back of a police wagon, I wasn't committing "bad" crimes: I was engaged in protests and, being young and stupid, I gave the constables a hard time when they told us to move.
Deep down, I do have more respect for someone who's arrested for protesting an unjust war or unfair treatment of workers than for, say, beating a spouse or stealing someone's Social Security check. I suppose most people feel the same way.
So I guess my advice to future generations would be something like "Be careful of what you get arrested for." Oh, and don't let the cops find worse things on your record when they run your name through their computers.
Of course, anyone who would listen to such advice probably doesn't need to hear it. On the other hand, Roberto Carlos DeLeon most likely would not heed my pearl of wisdom, or much of anything I'd say.
During a traffic stop in San Angelo, Texas, he was found to be in possession of less than two ounces of marijuana. When the officer checked his records, a warrant was found--for assault causing bodily injury of a family member and continuous violence against the family.
Sounds like a real charmer, doesn't he?
And what led to the traffic stop that opened up this Pandora's box? He was riding a bicycle with "defective" brakes, headlights and reflector.
Hmm...I wonder how the cops determined that his brakes were "defective". Was he unable to stop when he was ordered to do so?
