In the spring of 2017, I spent two months volunteering at the Jubilee Soup Kitchen in Pittsburgh. One day, a 70-year-old black man named Rupert showed up with a nasty bruise over his eye. A bicycle accident because of faulty brakes, he said.
John W. Miller recounts this experience in America: The Jesuit Review. After asking around, "I was stunned by how many people rode bicycles to come get their meals," he recalls.
In his article, he reports something I've described in other posts: In cities like Pittsburgh and New York people who cycle by choice--whether for transportation, recreation or fitness--tend to be younger, better-educated (and whiter) and have better incomes than those who cycle out of necessity. In fact, those in the latter category are in the lowest income categories and include the unemployed and those who receive public assistance--and, of course, use soup kitchens.
From Dreamstime
He also makes an observation I've related: Poor cyclists are, as often as not, riding bikes in dire need of repair and maintenance. They may be riding bikes purchased from flea markets, yard sales or on the street--or inherited, or rescued from a curbside or fished out of a dumpster.
Miller applauds organizations and initiatives that give bikes to the poor--and, in the case of programs like Recycle a Bicycle, teach people how to resurrect bikes that might have otherwise met their fate in a landfill. But he also points out that it's necessary to keep those bike maintained so more folks don't end up like Rupert. Even more to the point, a reliable bike is reliable transportation--to school, a training program or a job.
Finally, since he's writing in a Jesuit magazine, Miller makes the point that everything he recommends is consistent with the teachings of the Catholic Church--and the current Pope has expressed his approval of bicycles. Given that he's expressed more genuine concern for the poor than other prelates, it's not a surprise.
