In much of Europe, cyclo-cross
season is in progress, or getting underway.
Until fairly recently, this form of bicycle racing was all but unknown
in the US. Part of the reason for that
may have been that around the same time that Greg LeMond was winning the Tour
de France, bicycle racing was enjoying its first spurt of popularity in the US
since the days of the six-day races, but mountain biking was also becoming
popular. Americans who were just
starting to pay attention to cycling subscribed to the “road racing/mountain
biking” polarity. Some seemed to think
that mountain biking and cyclo cross were the same thing.
Here is the difference between the
two: In mountain (or, more accurately,
off-road) biking, you ride—and sometimes jump or hop—over whatever comes your
way, but in cyclo-cross, you might actually hop off your bike and sling it over
your shoulder to ford a stream, wade through mud, climb rocks (or a fence!) or
goose-step your way through un-strategically placed 2x4s, rocks or debris. Having done both, I think that mountain or
off-road riding is about riding over whatever terrain you encounter, while
cyclo-cross is more about getting you and your bike over any and all kinds of
obstacles. To use a ski analogy,
cross-country and downhill mountain biking can be compared to their skiing
counterparts, while cyclo-cross is like the biathlon with bikes and without the
rifles.
In the past, racers often fitted old
frames with cantilever bosses and wheels with wider tires and treads suited to
mud and other conditions for cyclo-cross.
Bikes built specifically for that kind of racing are a fairly recent
development. I’ve owned one in my life:
a Voodoo Wazoo.
As you can see, the frame was made
of oversized TIG-welded Reynolds tubing and stays, which made it stiff for a
bike with its geometry. One result is
that, even though it was somewhat heavier than my road bikes, it climbed
well. It also remained stable even with
a rack and full panniers. As you might
expect, I rode the Wazoo on three loaded tours: from France into Spain through
the Pyrenees, along the vineyards and chateaux of the Loire, and through the
Alps from Lyon into Italy and Switzerland and back.
The only real complaint I had about
the bike was that it had an odd chainstay configuration, which made it
difficult to install a triple crankset and get a good chainline. I had one smaller quibble: When I bought the bike (complete), it came
with V-brakes and Shimano “brifters”.
V-brakes aren’t made to work with road levers, at least not the ones
available at that time. Voodoo included a “travel agent”, which was supposed to
compensate for the fact that road levers have less range of motion (or “pull”)
than V-brakes are designed for. Alas,
the setup never worked to my satisfaction; before I embarked upon my tours, I
switched to cantilever brakes.
I bought the bike, as it turned out,
during a transition from one model year to the next (1997-98). I expected to get the 1997 model, which had
the same frame in a shade of green rather like chartreuse. As you can see, I ended up with the 1998
model, which was only available in a screaming bright orange. The color wasn’t my cup of tea; however, the components were actually, I
thought, slightly better than the ones on the 1997 model. And I paid the same price for the new model
that I would have paid for the older one.
The Wazoo is the sort of bike you’d
want to have if you lived in the country and could have only one bike, but you
wanted that bike to give you a lively ride while holding up to varied
conditions. I might, one day, have Mercian build something like it for me—with
lugs and in finish #57, of course.