I haven't been part of any religion or faith tradition in a long time. I did, however, attend Catholic school and was an altar boy. (That sounds so odd to me after more than a decade and a half of living as female.) One thing I recall is that while we had an hour of religious instruction every day and were brought to confession after our Friday classes, we were not encouraged to read the Bible.
Later on, I did read the book on my own and, in fact, was even part of a couple of study groups. I came to the conclusion that while the Roman church might have had its own reasons to discourage Bible reading, it probably saved me, if unintentionally, from falling down the rabbit hole of all rabbit holes: Biblical interpretation.
Since I can't read the Biblical languages, I can't say which translations are the most accurate, or which interpretations are closest to, as Constituional fundamentalists would say, the original intent. (Constitutional scholarship might be the second-deepest rabbit hole.) Was God male, or did God become so because of translations? Did Jesus turn water into an alcoholic beverage rather than wine, and should Matthew 6:11 read "Give us this day our daily nourishment"?
Palm Sunday commemorates Jesus' entry into Jerusalem on, as recounted in Matthew 21. Traditionally, this account has him riding a donkey. But at least one Biblical scholar that someone was exercising poetic license, if you will, and argues that the story should have him astride a "pack animal" or "vehicle."
Hmm...How far can we take such an interpretation?
No comments:
Post a Comment