In January, I wrote about a British judge who, in sentencing two thieves, took into account that each of the bicycles they swiped costs more than many automobiles. His thinking on this matter is more advanced than that of just about any of his counterparts in the US, or almost any American law enforcement officer.
In that post, I also expressed the hope that his insight also includes other effects of bicycle theft on the people who lose their machines. While I empathise with the shop owner who loses multiple bikes with five-figure price tags, like the one who was victimized by the perps the judge sentenced, similar incidents probably don't comprise the vast majority of bike thefts. More often, I imagine, those episodes include the nurse, teacher, store employee, student or someone else who locks their bike to a street sign outside their place of work or study in the morning and returns to find said sign sans velo at the end of the day. Those incidents also include folks whose garages, sheds or homes are broken into and who may also lose other items or cash along with their bikes.
The latter scenario unfolded in Windsor. As in the Duke Of. The unfortunate property owner lost a Trek Madone with a graphite-colored Land Rover and other high-monetary value items. In response, Thames Valley police tweeted an appeal for help in finding the bike. Their message included a description, taken from surveillance videos, of the thieves and their getaway vehicle: a white Audi A3 with plate number GN64 XMM.
That message "boiled my bacon," in the words of one respondent. For one thing, that person complained about the constables heading the tweet with the title "high value burglary" so that "some resident who is very very well off for a bob or three can pull strings!"
That respondent has a point, and amplified it with this, "Yet a local fella in Caversham has his electric bike stolen while in Reading and he can ill-afford to replace it until he's saved up enough earnings, and Thames Valley Police weren't interested."
That person has a great point. While some ride electric bikes for pleasure or to commute to school or well-paying jobs, if the situation in England is anything like it is here in New York, I imagine that the majority of electric bikes are used by delivery workers. Most of them are immigrants who speak English not well or at all and have few, if any, marketable skills or credentials recognized in their adopted country. Therefore, as the person who reacted to the bobbies' tweet pointed out, they either save for their machines or buy them on credit or an installment plan, whether payment arrangements are made with their employer or bike dealer.
And the student or worker who parks and loses a battered old ten- or three-speed is losing his or her means of transportation and, possibly recreation or fitness. Such things are often more important, especially where mass transportation is spotty or unreliable and for people who may not have the spare funds to join a gym or for other recreational activities.
I think the judge I mentioned in my earlier post and whoever reacted to Thames Valley Police tweet should get together and preside over a court for bike theft!
No comments:
Post a Comment