I came of age as a cyclist during the '70's Bike Boom of North America. Ten-speeds were the bikes of choice. Of US bike manufacturers, only Schwinn had been producing derailleur-equipped bikes in the years before the boom. Other manufacturers--such as Columbia, Murray and AMF--began to offer "lightweight" bikes made of flash-welded gaspipe tubing with derailleurs and hand brakes. To be fair, Schwinn's "lightweights"--with the exceptions of the Paramount and Superior--were also tanks with derailleurs fitted to them.
A similar scenario played out during the 1950s and 1960s. While the number of adult cyclists--and the demand for adult bicycles--were nowhere near as great as that of the 1970s, both increased gradually during those two decades. And American bike manufacturers were not ready to produce the bike requested by adults: three speed "English racers". None--not even Schwinn--had ever made such a bike.
Schwinn responded in the way they would to the demand for ten-speeds in the 1970s: they fitted their heavy frames with Sturmey-Archer three-speed hubs and called those bikes "lightweights". On the other hand, other American bike companies did something that would have, in an earlier decade, seemed unthinkable: they imported bikes and re-badged them.
So, English three-speed bikes were sold under the brands of AMF (Hercules), Huffy and other American companies. Strip away their decals and they are indistinguishable from Raleigh, Rudge or other English three-speed bikes of the time.
Columbia was another American manufacturer who imported English three-speeds. That fact leads me to believe that this Columbia might also have been made by one of those British manufacturers:
The tell-tale signs of a Raleigh folding bike are there: the brakes, the Sturmey-Archer hub, the cottered crank (at least in the style seen on that bike). But the frame doesn't look like any of the folding or "shopper" bikes Raleigh was making at the time. The frames of most such machines had, in essence, a down tube but no top tube. The reverse is true on the Columbia in the photos. I wonder how that affects the ride.
I watched the bike on eBay a few months ago. No, I didn't buy it! I admit, I was tempted: It would have been an interesting project. Apparently, not many of those bikes were made, and from what I could find, Columbia offered them in only one year: 1966.
Fifty years later, no bike like it--or, for that matter, the old English three-speed--is made today. And, of the bike brands mentioned in this post, only two exist today: Schwinn and Raleigh. Both are owned by conglomerates and their bikes are made for them in China or Taiwan. Which means, of course, that it's unlikely that any bike like the Columbia folder will be made any time soon.
AMF Hercules three-speed, made in England |
A similar scenario played out during the 1950s and 1960s. While the number of adult cyclists--and the demand for adult bicycles--were nowhere near as great as that of the 1970s, both increased gradually during those two decades. And American bike manufacturers were not ready to produce the bike requested by adults: three speed "English racers". None--not even Schwinn--had ever made such a bike.
Schwinn responded in the way they would to the demand for ten-speeds in the 1970s: they fitted their heavy frames with Sturmey-Archer three-speed hubs and called those bikes "lightweights". On the other hand, other American bike companies did something that would have, in an earlier decade, seemed unthinkable: they imported bikes and re-badged them.
So, English three-speed bikes were sold under the brands of AMF (Hercules), Huffy and other American companies. Strip away their decals and they are indistinguishable from Raleigh, Rudge or other English three-speed bikes of the time.
Columbia was another American manufacturer who imported English three-speeds. That fact leads me to believe that this Columbia might also have been made by one of those British manufacturers:
The tell-tale signs of a Raleigh folding bike are there: the brakes, the Sturmey-Archer hub, the cottered crank (at least in the style seen on that bike). But the frame doesn't look like any of the folding or "shopper" bikes Raleigh was making at the time. The frames of most such machines had, in essence, a down tube but no top tube. The reverse is true on the Columbia in the photos. I wonder how that affects the ride.
I watched the bike on eBay a few months ago. No, I didn't buy it! I admit, I was tempted: It would have been an interesting project. Apparently, not many of those bikes were made, and from what I could find, Columbia offered them in only one year: 1966.
Fifty years later, no bike like it--or, for that matter, the old English three-speed--is made today. And, of the bike brands mentioned in this post, only two exist today: Schwinn and Raleigh. Both are owned by conglomerates and their bikes are made for them in China or Taiwan. Which means, of course, that it's unlikely that any bike like the Columbia folder will be made any time soon.