There're too many of those gosh-darned bike riders on this-here road.
OK, so the complaint might not have been articulated in quite that way. But I've given you the gist of it, as it was relayed to a state legislative representative.
So what does that legislator do? He introduces a bill that would require all cyclists riding on public streets or highways in his state to register their bikes (for a fee) or face a fine. They would also be required to affix a plate to the rear of their bicycles.
The representative is Jeffrey Elmore, a Republican who represents Wilkes County in the North Carolina House of Representatives. He filed the bill "by request," which usually means the representative filed it as a favor to constituent or someone who's not in the general assembly. It doesn't necessarily mean that the representative who files the bill is in favor of it.
Elmore hasn't said anything about the bill, HB157, since filing it. However, at least two of his colleagues--both Democrats--have voiced their opposition to it.
Susan Fisher of Buncombe County said it would discourage people from using their bikes to get to work or school, or for recreation, at a time when "[w]e should be encouraging alternative forms of transportation in light of the carbon restrained future we're facing."
And Brian Turner, also of Buncombe County, pointed out that such a requirement would place an unfair burden on poor people who rely on their bicycles as their primary mode of transportation. He also raised another issue: "Is this what we want our police to be enforcing?"
The question of enforcement is related to another issue: Would visitors from out of state be required to purchase a temporary permit? If not, the police would probably waste a lot of time pulling over cyclists who didn't have plates on their bikes but who came Tar Heel State for a race or a tour of the coast or the Blue Ridge Mountains.
That last point was not lost on Mike Sule, the executive director of nonprofit Asheville On Bikes. He points out that his state has become one of the more popular destinations for bicycle tourism. "WNC (Western North Carolina) is a great place to ride a bike," he explains. "But so is Pennsylvania, and so is Tennessee" and that "we have to understand that we are competing with those other states for people to come here and enjoy themselves."
He also wonders whether such a bill, if passed, would have a negative impact on the state's bicycle manufacturing and retail industries, which are thriving even with the demise of Performance Bikes. WNC is home to Industry 9, Fox Factory, Cane Creek and other bicycle-related companies.
Sule also made one other really good point against the bill. He noted that other cities, including Seattle, San Diego, Chicago and Fort Lauderdale, have imposed similar fees. In none of those cities did requiring cyclists to register their bikes for a fee meet the objectives, whatever they were, that served as the rationale for such fees. And enforcing such regulations cost more than the cities collected in fees--while cycling was discouraged.
OK, so the complaint might not have been articulated in quite that way. But I've given you the gist of it, as it was relayed to a state legislative representative.
So what does that legislator do? He introduces a bill that would require all cyclists riding on public streets or highways in his state to register their bikes (for a fee) or face a fine. They would also be required to affix a plate to the rear of their bicycles.
The representative is Jeffrey Elmore, a Republican who represents Wilkes County in the North Carolina House of Representatives. He filed the bill "by request," which usually means the representative filed it as a favor to constituent or someone who's not in the general assembly. It doesn't necessarily mean that the representative who files the bill is in favor of it.
Elmore hasn't said anything about the bill, HB157, since filing it. However, at least two of his colleagues--both Democrats--have voiced their opposition to it.
Susan Fisher of Buncombe County said it would discourage people from using their bikes to get to work or school, or for recreation, at a time when "[w]e should be encouraging alternative forms of transportation in light of the carbon restrained future we're facing."
And Brian Turner, also of Buncombe County, pointed out that such a requirement would place an unfair burden on poor people who rely on their bicycles as their primary mode of transportation. He also raised another issue: "Is this what we want our police to be enforcing?"
 |
| Family cycling in Boone, North Carolina |
The question of enforcement is related to another issue: Would visitors from out of state be required to purchase a temporary permit? If not, the police would probably waste a lot of time pulling over cyclists who didn't have plates on their bikes but who came Tar Heel State for a race or a tour of the coast or the Blue Ridge Mountains.
That last point was not lost on Mike Sule, the executive director of nonprofit Asheville On Bikes. He points out that his state has become one of the more popular destinations for bicycle tourism. "WNC (Western North Carolina) is a great place to ride a bike," he explains. "But so is Pennsylvania, and so is Tennessee" and that "we have to understand that we are competing with those other states for people to come here and enjoy themselves."
He also wonders whether such a bill, if passed, would have a negative impact on the state's bicycle manufacturing and retail industries, which are thriving even with the demise of Performance Bikes. WNC is home to Industry 9, Fox Factory, Cane Creek and other bicycle-related companies.
Sule also made one other really good point against the bill. He noted that other cities, including Seattle, San Diego, Chicago and Fort Lauderdale, have imposed similar fees. In none of those cities did requiring cyclists to register their bikes for a fee meet the objectives, whatever they were, that served as the rationale for such fees. And enforcing such regulations cost more than the cities collected in fees--while cycling was discouraged.
