When I say "The Netherlands", what's the first thing you think of?
Well, since you're reading this blog, I wouldn't be surprised (or displeased) if you said "cycling."
OK, so what's the next thing you think of?
Some of you would say "windmills." Fair enough. I'd also bet that some of you think of art. After all, it's a country that gave us Rembrandt, Vermeer, Van Gogh and Mondrian.
So it makes sense that the Dutch would produce some nice bike-related art.
OK, so this isn't worthy of the Masters, classical or modern. But, as we say here in Queens--in a Cyndi Lauper accent, of course: Ya gotta love it!
(She once said, "I speak the Queens English. It's just the wrong Queens, that's all!")
As I have mentioned in other posts, I've ridden tandems only a couple of times in my life. It's something I would do again if the opportunity presented itself. Of course, for such an opportunity to present itself, I'd need a tandem partner--and, of course, a tandem bicycle. About the latter: Not many of us who live in NYC apartments own them.
Anyway, my experience as a transgender woman has led me to notice some of the male biases in cycling I hadn't noticed when I was still riding and living as male.
While I was of average height for a male, I am taller than most women. That means it's still relatively easy for me to get a diamond frame that fits well (though I've still opted for custom bikes, for various reasons) and if I look and wait, I can get a women's or mixte frame that suits me. On the other hand, it's more difficult for me to buy cycle clothing, as some of my body proportions have changed, in part from my gender transition as well as aging. So, while it used to be easy for me to buy clothing--all I had to know was my waist and chest (or shirt) size--now clothes that are the "right" size might be too loose or tight in the hips, bust or other areas--or sleeves, pants, tights and shorts (!) might be too short.
All of that, I believe, is a result of not considering the full range of measurements possible for a woman. There seems to be an assumption that female cyclists will be young and built like fashion models. Also, I have too often seen a built-in inferiority complex when it comes to stuff made for women: It's, as often as not, just less-well-designed or lower-quality versions of stuff made for men.
Oh, there's another bias I've noticed:
The vast majority of high-quality tandems I've seen have "diamond" or "men's" frames in both the front and rear. In a lot of ways, that makes sense because tandems have such long wheelbases and "diamond" frames are usually stiffer and more stable, than dropped top-tube frames with otherwise similar design and materials.
That itself isn't quite as much a reflection of bias as this:
Just about every tandem I've seen that combines men's and women's designs has the men's or "diamond" frame on the front and the dropped top tube on the rear. The assumption is that the man will be the "captain" and the woman will be the "stoker." I guess it's still that way for most couples who ride tandems, but over the years, I've encountered a slowly but steadily increasing number of couples in which the woman is the stronger or more dedicated rider.
For such couples, a tandem might look more like this:
unless, of course--to use a somewhat dated metaphor--the woman "wears the pants" in the couple.
Whatever their riding roles and styles, they will surely turn heads if they ride this:
