In the middle of the journey of my life, I am--as always--a woman on a bike. Although I do not know where this road will lead, the way is not lost, for I have arrived here. And I am on my bicycle, again.
I am Justine Valinotti.
14 October 2018
13 October 2018
I Christen Thee Negrosa
Finally! She's together!
No, that's not what someone said about me after I figured it all out. (As if I ever did!) I'm talking about...another bike. I mean, what else could I be talking about on this blog, right?
Specifically, I'm referring to the 1973 Mercian Olympic (I mistakenly identified it earlier as a King of Mercia; Grant at Mercian confirmed that it's an Olympic) I bought in June. The funny thing is that I didn't have to do much to it, but it took me longer to finish than it took to get Dee-Lilah, my new Mercian Vincitore Special, ready after the frame arrived.
In the case of Dee-Lilah, I had all of the parts, and Eli (of Ruth SF Works) made a couple of bags for me and once Hal put it all together, it was ready to go. I haven't found any need to adjust or change anything yet.
On the other hand, for the Olympic, I had to look for a couple of things, and make a couple of other choices.
Right from the beginning, I replaced the tires, which were cheap and mismatched, with a pair of Continental Grand Prix 4 Seasons. I also swapped out the SunTour freewheel for another SunTour--the ProCompe that came with the bike (and is now on another) for a New Winner--and the unknown-brand chain for a Sedisport that'd been in its package for 30+ years.
After a couple of rides, I knew I wanted to change the stem from the 9 mm extension that came with it to a 10. The stem and bars that came with the bike were Cinellis, in the old 26.4mm clamp diameter. I like the bars, so I didn't want to buy new ones. That meant looking for a stem in the proper diameter. I also wanted to find one that had the old-style oval logo, like the one that came with the bike, but had no luck there. Oh, well. Cinelli has never produced an ugly logo, so I don't mind having the newer one. Besides, the logo switch seems to have been made not long after the frame was built.
Now, stems before the 1990s didn't have "faceplate" clamps. So, if you want to switch stems, you have to unwrap the bar tape. I didn't mind, as the tape that came with the bike was a mess: It was faded and felt as if it had been epoxied onto the bars. And the rubber hoods were disintegrating on the brake levers.
Luckily for me, I managed to find a pair of original-style Campagnolo gum hoods for not much more than they cost 40 years ago. Best of all, they were fresh and supple. As for the tape, I decided to go with something basic but classy: black Tressostar cloth tape. I spiced it up a bit, though, with red bar plugs.
To match those plugs--and the red parts of the frame--I found some vintage red Christophe straps. And the one truly unsightly part of the bike as I got it--apart from the brake hoods and tape--were the toe clips, which were rusted and pitted even though nothing else on the bike was. They were from "Cycle Pro", which offered some decent stuff back in the day. But, since we're talking about a vintage Mercian with Campagnolo parts, I thought only Christophe clips would do. And they're what I put on those Campy pedals.
Now, of course, we all know that we really make our bikes our own with accessories. I could have sworn I had a Silca frame pump somewhere--but I couldn't find it for the life of me. Oh, well. Hal had one, but it looked like hell. He made a suggestion: a Zefal HP or HPX. I just happened to have one in the latter, in just the right size. And, while it's probably from the 80s or even later, it looks good, if not period-perfect, on the frame.
And, yes, that's a real, live Specialites TA cage on the handlebars. Like the brake hoods, it was in pristine condition before I mounted it. I found, though, that I needed to use longer screws than the ones that came with the clamp. I have a feeling they were designed for old French handlebars, which are narrower at the "sleeve" area than my Cinellis.
The bag is from Acorn. I have another, larger, black bag that Eli made.
Even with those minor changes, I still can't believe my luck in finding that bike--with a Brooks Professional saddle in perfect condition, no less. And so soon after getting Dee-Lilah: It was like getting two birthday presents!
After accessorizing, there's one more thing you (or I, anyway) have to do in order to make your (my) bike your (my) own: name it. So, after putting that bottle cage on the handlebars, I christened her Negrosa.
Now I really have decisions to make whenever I go out for a ride: Dee-Lilah, Negrosa, Tosca (my Mercian fixed-gear), Arielle (my Mercian Audax) or Vera (my Mercian mixte).
No, that's not what someone said about me after I figured it all out. (As if I ever did!) I'm talking about...another bike. I mean, what else could I be talking about on this blog, right?
Specifically, I'm referring to the 1973 Mercian Olympic (I mistakenly identified it earlier as a King of Mercia; Grant at Mercian confirmed that it's an Olympic) I bought in June. The funny thing is that I didn't have to do much to it, but it took me longer to finish than it took to get Dee-Lilah, my new Mercian Vincitore Special, ready after the frame arrived.
In the case of Dee-Lilah, I had all of the parts, and Eli (of Ruth SF Works) made a couple of bags for me and once Hal put it all together, it was ready to go. I haven't found any need to adjust or change anything yet.
On the other hand, for the Olympic, I had to look for a couple of things, and make a couple of other choices.
Right from the beginning, I replaced the tires, which were cheap and mismatched, with a pair of Continental Grand Prix 4 Seasons. I also swapped out the SunTour freewheel for another SunTour--the ProCompe that came with the bike (and is now on another) for a New Winner--and the unknown-brand chain for a Sedisport that'd been in its package for 30+ years.
Old Cinelli logo. |
After a couple of rides, I knew I wanted to change the stem from the 9 mm extension that came with it to a 10. The stem and bars that came with the bike were Cinellis, in the old 26.4mm clamp diameter. I like the bars, so I didn't want to buy new ones. That meant looking for a stem in the proper diameter. I also wanted to find one that had the old-style oval logo, like the one that came with the bike, but had no luck there. Oh, well. Cinelli has never produced an ugly logo, so I don't mind having the newer one. Besides, the logo switch seems to have been made not long after the frame was built.
Now, stems before the 1990s didn't have "faceplate" clamps. So, if you want to switch stems, you have to unwrap the bar tape. I didn't mind, as the tape that came with the bike was a mess: It was faded and felt as if it had been epoxied onto the bars. And the rubber hoods were disintegrating on the brake levers.
Luckily for me, I managed to find a pair of original-style Campagnolo gum hoods for not much more than they cost 40 years ago. Best of all, they were fresh and supple. As for the tape, I decided to go with something basic but classy: black Tressostar cloth tape. I spiced it up a bit, though, with red bar plugs.
To match those plugs--and the red parts of the frame--I found some vintage red Christophe straps. And the one truly unsightly part of the bike as I got it--apart from the brake hoods and tape--were the toe clips, which were rusted and pitted even though nothing else on the bike was. They were from "Cycle Pro", which offered some decent stuff back in the day. But, since we're talking about a vintage Mercian with Campagnolo parts, I thought only Christophe clips would do. And they're what I put on those Campy pedals.
Now, of course, we all know that we really make our bikes our own with accessories. I could have sworn I had a Silca frame pump somewhere--but I couldn't find it for the life of me. Oh, well. Hal had one, but it looked like hell. He made a suggestion: a Zefal HP or HPX. I just happened to have one in the latter, in just the right size. And, while it's probably from the 80s or even later, it looks good, if not period-perfect, on the frame.
And, yes, that's a real, live Specialites TA cage on the handlebars. Like the brake hoods, it was in pristine condition before I mounted it. I found, though, that I needed to use longer screws than the ones that came with the clamp. I have a feeling they were designed for old French handlebars, which are narrower at the "sleeve" area than my Cinellis.
Yes, the bike came with that saddle! |
The bag is from Acorn. I have another, larger, black bag that Eli made.
Even with those minor changes, I still can't believe my luck in finding that bike--with a Brooks Professional saddle in perfect condition, no less. And so soon after getting Dee-Lilah: It was like getting two birthday presents!
After accessorizing, there's one more thing you (or I, anyway) have to do in order to make your (my) bike your (my) own: name it. So, after putting that bottle cage on the handlebars, I christened her Negrosa.
Now I really have decisions to make whenever I go out for a ride: Dee-Lilah, Negrosa, Tosca (my Mercian fixed-gear), Arielle (my Mercian Audax) or Vera (my Mercian mixte).
12 October 2018
Will Miji, Sue, Connie and Rebecca Become A "Forgotten" Generation?
A few weeks ago, much was made of Serena Williams calling an umpire a "liar" and "thief". Not long before that, tennis officials made a fuss over the outfit she wore, saying that it was "unbecoming" of the "traditions" of the "ladies" in the sport--or words to that effect.
While it's unfortunate that Serena has to take such criticism for, essentially, being a woman with a competitive spirit (and black), her experiences are nothing new. In fact, if you subtract the race factor and change sports, you have an idea of what another group of female athletes faced at the end of the 19th Century.
Those accounts form part of Roger Gilles' new book, Women on the Move: The Forgotten Era of Women's Bicycle Racing. Like Serena and other athletes who come from backgrounds different from others in their sport, women who raced during the 1890s had to buck social norms--in their case, the ones of the Victorian Era.
Some of those conventions were sartorial. Women were still expected to wear hoopskirts; though "bloomers" had been invented, women were still castigated, or worse, for wearing them.
What that meant,as Gilles points out, is that the first, now-forgotten heyday of women's racing didn't start until the 1890s--decades after men started riding bicycles--because it couldn't have begun any earlier. The "safety" bicycle--with two wheels of more or less equal size--didn't make its appearance until the late 1880s. Before that, cyclists rode "penny farthings" with high front wheels. I haven't tried, but I imagine it's extremely difficult, if not impossible, to mount--let alone ride--such a machine when one is upholstered as women of that time were expected to be.
Although (sometimes self-appointed) moral arbiters of the time denounced women when they decided to "dress like men"--i.e., wear bloomers or shorter skirts--it had the not-so-surprising effect of attracting male spectators to the races, which were mostly on the track. Even if they didn't take the women seriously as cyclists, those men and boys could see females, if not nude, then at least with less clothing than usual.
One result is that, ironically, some female racers were well-paid. In fact, many were the sole breadwinners of their families (an unheard-of role for Victorian women) and a few even made more money than their male counterparts.
Still, female racers didn't get the same respect as the men. Press coverage of the time tended to focus less on the competition between women on the bike than off it. Instead of the races, journalists focused on the "catfights" and too often portrayed them as petty women rather than the competitive athletes they were.
So, while unfavorable coverage may not have been responsible for ending the first "golden age" of women's racing--which Gilles places in 1902--it may have helped to prevent a revival. During the 1920s and '30's, there was renewed interest in racing--mainly the six-day variety--but I have not been able to find accounts of womens' races from that time.
At least here in the US, there would not be more "glory days" for women's racing until the 1970s, when a generation of talented riders that included Mary Jane "Miji" Reoch, Sue Novara-Reber, Connie Carpenter-Phinney and Rebecca Twigg burst onto the scene and dominated their field for more than a decade.
After another talented generation of women--including France's Jeanne Longo (road) and American Missy Giove (mountain) led their field during the 1990s, women's racing seems to have slipped into relative obscurity. If global warming or one of El Cheeto Grande's tweets doesn't wipe all of us out, will some future historian write the equivalent of Gilles' book about the "forgotten" generation of women who raced from the 1970s through the 1990s?
While it's unfortunate that Serena has to take such criticism for, essentially, being a woman with a competitive spirit (and black), her experiences are nothing new. In fact, if you subtract the race factor and change sports, you have an idea of what another group of female athletes faced at the end of the 19th Century.
The opening lineup of a race in Chicago, 2 March 1896. |
Those accounts form part of Roger Gilles' new book, Women on the Move: The Forgotten Era of Women's Bicycle Racing. Like Serena and other athletes who come from backgrounds different from others in their sport, women who raced during the 1890s had to buck social norms--in their case, the ones of the Victorian Era.
Some of those conventions were sartorial. Women were still expected to wear hoopskirts; though "bloomers" had been invented, women were still castigated, or worse, for wearing them.
What that meant,as Gilles points out, is that the first, now-forgotten heyday of women's racing didn't start until the 1890s--decades after men started riding bicycles--because it couldn't have begun any earlier. The "safety" bicycle--with two wheels of more or less equal size--didn't make its appearance until the late 1880s. Before that, cyclists rode "penny farthings" with high front wheels. I haven't tried, but I imagine it's extremely difficult, if not impossible, to mount--let alone ride--such a machine when one is upholstered as women of that time were expected to be.
Although (sometimes self-appointed) moral arbiters of the time denounced women when they decided to "dress like men"--i.e., wear bloomers or shorter skirts--it had the not-so-surprising effect of attracting male spectators to the races, which were mostly on the track. Even if they didn't take the women seriously as cyclists, those men and boys could see females, if not nude, then at least with less clothing than usual.
One result is that, ironically, some female racers were well-paid. In fact, many were the sole breadwinners of their families (an unheard-of role for Victorian women) and a few even made more money than their male counterparts.
Still, female racers didn't get the same respect as the men. Press coverage of the time tended to focus less on the competition between women on the bike than off it. Instead of the races, journalists focused on the "catfights" and too often portrayed them as petty women rather than the competitive athletes they were.
So, while unfavorable coverage may not have been responsible for ending the first "golden age" of women's racing--which Gilles places in 1902--it may have helped to prevent a revival. During the 1920s and '30's, there was renewed interest in racing--mainly the six-day variety--but I have not been able to find accounts of womens' races from that time.
At least here in the US, there would not be more "glory days" for women's racing until the 1970s, when a generation of talented riders that included Mary Jane "Miji" Reoch, Sue Novara-Reber, Connie Carpenter-Phinney and Rebecca Twigg burst onto the scene and dominated their field for more than a decade.
After another talented generation of women--including France's Jeanne Longo (road) and American Missy Giove (mountain) led their field during the 1990s, women's racing seems to have slipped into relative obscurity. If global warming or one of El Cheeto Grande's tweets doesn't wipe all of us out, will some future historian write the equivalent of Gilles' book about the "forgotten" generation of women who raced from the 1970s through the 1990s?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)