24 May 2020
23 May 2020
Untangling His Brakes
All of my bikes have steel frames. Some, however, were made recently and have modern componentry. The others are older and have components that are more or less "period correct."
Even if one weren't well-versed in the nuances of modern vs. retro machines, he or she could tell which bikes are which by one tell-tale detail: the brake cables. My modern bikes have aero levers with concealed cables (or, in the case of Vera, my Mercian mixte, inverse brake levers with cables hidden under tape) while my older bikes have traditional cables that loop from the tops of the brake levers.
Hidden "aero" cables were designed, as the name implies, for aerodynamics. For my purposes, that doesn't matter much. The reason I use aero levers are that they're designed to work well with modern brakes--and because I like the feel of one lever in particular: the Cane Creek SCR5/Tektro RL 200.
(Cane Creek's lever is a Tektro with a nicer finish and little gekkos embossed on the hoods. Both levers, lamentably, were discontinued several years ago.)
When I was an active mountain biker, I wished there were an "aero" version of mountain bike brake levers. I found that, even though my mountain frames were smaller, I needed longer cables and housings because in tight technical stretches, I was more likely to make a sharp turn, even to the point that my bars were almost parallel to the top tube.
The problem came when riding through areas of bush and bramble: The cables, on occasion, would become entangled in them. Siddesh Dubal, a Purdue University student and researcher, had the same problem. Unlike me, he came up with a solution. "I created this device based on my own experiences while mountain biking in India and other places," he explains.
I'm probably not the first person to look at it and wonder, "Why didn't I think of that?" Apparently, he used a modified top cap from a headless headset (which practically all new mountain bikes use) to rout the cables through the steerer tube rather than across the stem and along the top tube. The result, Dubal says, is something that "provides safety and convenience for riders, and is also simple and cheap to manufacture and install on a bike."
Will it make him rich? Who knows? Somehow, though, I think Siddesh Dubal has a bright future--as a cyclist and in whatever career he pursues.
Even if one weren't well-versed in the nuances of modern vs. retro machines, he or she could tell which bikes are which by one tell-tale detail: the brake cables. My modern bikes have aero levers with concealed cables (or, in the case of Vera, my Mercian mixte, inverse brake levers with cables hidden under tape) while my older bikes have traditional cables that loop from the tops of the brake levers.
Hidden "aero" cables were designed, as the name implies, for aerodynamics. For my purposes, that doesn't matter much. The reason I use aero levers are that they're designed to work well with modern brakes--and because I like the feel of one lever in particular: the Cane Creek SCR5/Tektro RL 200.
(Cane Creek's lever is a Tektro with a nicer finish and little gekkos embossed on the hoods. Both levers, lamentably, were discontinued several years ago.)
When I was an active mountain biker, I wished there were an "aero" version of mountain bike brake levers. I found that, even though my mountain frames were smaller, I needed longer cables and housings because in tight technical stretches, I was more likely to make a sharp turn, even to the point that my bars were almost parallel to the top tube.
The problem came when riding through areas of bush and bramble: The cables, on occasion, would become entangled in them. Siddesh Dubal, a Purdue University student and researcher, had the same problem. Unlike me, he came up with a solution. "I created this device based on my own experiences while mountain biking in India and other places," he explains.
I'm probably not the first person to look at it and wonder, "Why didn't I think of that?" Apparently, he used a modified top cap from a headless headset (which practically all new mountain bikes use) to rout the cables through the steerer tube rather than across the stem and along the top tube. The result, Dubal says, is something that "provides safety and convenience for riders, and is also simple and cheap to manufacture and install on a bike."
Will it make him rich? Who knows? Somehow, though, I think Siddesh Dubal has a bright future--as a cyclist and in whatever career he pursues.
22 May 2020
Bikeways To The Future: I Hope Not!
Last week, I wrote about the current bicycle shortage and compared it to a similar scarcity during the 1970s Bike Boom. Then, I waited three months for my Schwinn Continental, not a custom-built frame. Today I want to talk about another parallel between then and now.
There probably was never a time, save for the 1890s (or now), when everyday people were more aware of cycling and cyclists as they were from about 1969 to 1974. Back then, governments at every level from counties to the nation were floating plans to build "bikeways" (as bike lanes were called then) to, perhaps, an even greater degree than we see today.
Back then, regular cyclists included Dr. Paul Dudley White, President Eisenhower's personal physician and a founder of the American Heart Association; Stewart Udall, the Secretary of the Interior under Presidents Kennedy and Johnson and one of the founders of modern environmental movements; and John Volpe, Secretary of Transportation. Also among their number was Carl Bernstein, who helped to expose the Watergate scandal and, much to his chagrin, one of the Watergate "burglars" he exposed!
As transportation writer Carlton Reid notes, the 1970s Bike Boom offers hope, as well as cautionary tales, for today's "Boom". One hopeful sign is that while, in some areas, cyclists are stereotyped as overprivileged milennials or hipsters--the bohoisie or bourgemians, if you will: the very antithesis of a rebellion against consumer capitalism--back in the day, adult riders were labelled as "bike freaks" who were hippies, commies or worse.
More to the point, though, too many decisions about bicycle policy were being made by people who weren't cyclists and, worse, didn't have the collective memory, if you will, of cycling that Europeans and people in other parts of the world could draw upon. So there was an emphasis on "bikeways" that separated cyclists completely, not only from motorized traffic, but the community in general: They were good for leisurely weekend rides, but not for transportation. That is one reason why the massive bike sales of the early 1970s (which dwarfed mountain bike sales during their late 1980s-eary 1990s boom) did not translate into a culture in which bicycles were an integral part. Once the "boom" ended, many people hung up their bikes for good.
That ignorance of cycling extended to law enforcement officials, as it too often does now. I have been stopped by cops who insisted I broke the law when I didn't and that I should engage in practices that actually endanger cyclists, such as riding all the way to the right and following traffic signals when crossing busy intersections.
Also, as Reid points out, while bikes from that era are called "vintage" and sell for high prices on eBay, the fact is that most bikes sold during that time were of low quality. In other words, when most people bought Schwinns or Raleighs (if they didn't buy department-store bikes), they weren't buying Internationals or Paramounts, they were shelling out their money for Records or Varsities--or for any number of low-end models from makers like Atala or any number of smaller companies that haven't been heard from since. Most people never learned to even fix a flat, let alone take care of more complex problems, so when things went wrong, they never got fixed. Moreover, most of the bikes sold really weren't designed for the way people were riding them. That is why, for example, lower-end ten-speeds came with brake extension (a.k.a. "suicide") levers: Most casual cyclists are better off with upright or flat handlebars than on drop bars.
So, Reid cautions that we must learn that--as Richard Ballantine argued in his 1972 book--"bikeways" alone are not alone the answer. For one thing, it's much better to take lanes and streets from vehicular traffic and to raise awareness of cyclists, pedestrians and motorists alike of cyclists' right to ride. So are bikes that are suited to the riders' needs and inclinations. Otherwise, a lot of the bikes purchased today will be hanging in rafters--or buried in landfills--by 2030.
There probably was never a time, save for the 1890s (or now), when everyday people were more aware of cycling and cyclists as they were from about 1969 to 1974. Back then, governments at every level from counties to the nation were floating plans to build "bikeways" (as bike lanes were called then) to, perhaps, an even greater degree than we see today.
Back then, regular cyclists included Dr. Paul Dudley White, President Eisenhower's personal physician and a founder of the American Heart Association; Stewart Udall, the Secretary of the Interior under Presidents Kennedy and Johnson and one of the founders of modern environmental movements; and John Volpe, Secretary of Transportation. Also among their number was Carl Bernstein, who helped to expose the Watergate scandal and, much to his chagrin, one of the Watergate "burglars" he exposed!
As transportation writer Carlton Reid notes, the 1970s Bike Boom offers hope, as well as cautionary tales, for today's "Boom". One hopeful sign is that while, in some areas, cyclists are stereotyped as overprivileged milennials or hipsters--the bohoisie or bourgemians, if you will: the very antithesis of a rebellion against consumer capitalism--back in the day, adult riders were labelled as "bike freaks" who were hippies, commies or worse.
More to the point, though, too many decisions about bicycle policy were being made by people who weren't cyclists and, worse, didn't have the collective memory, if you will, of cycling that Europeans and people in other parts of the world could draw upon. So there was an emphasis on "bikeways" that separated cyclists completely, not only from motorized traffic, but the community in general: They were good for leisurely weekend rides, but not for transportation. That is one reason why the massive bike sales of the early 1970s (which dwarfed mountain bike sales during their late 1980s-eary 1990s boom) did not translate into a culture in which bicycles were an integral part. Once the "boom" ended, many people hung up their bikes for good.
That ignorance of cycling extended to law enforcement officials, as it too often does now. I have been stopped by cops who insisted I broke the law when I didn't and that I should engage in practices that actually endanger cyclists, such as riding all the way to the right and following traffic signals when crossing busy intersections.
Also, as Reid points out, while bikes from that era are called "vintage" and sell for high prices on eBay, the fact is that most bikes sold during that time were of low quality. In other words, when most people bought Schwinns or Raleighs (if they didn't buy department-store bikes), they weren't buying Internationals or Paramounts, they were shelling out their money for Records or Varsities--or for any number of low-end models from makers like Atala or any number of smaller companies that haven't been heard from since. Most people never learned to even fix a flat, let alone take care of more complex problems, so when things went wrong, they never got fixed. Moreover, most of the bikes sold really weren't designed for the way people were riding them. That is why, for example, lower-end ten-speeds came with brake extension (a.k.a. "suicide") levers: Most casual cyclists are better off with upright or flat handlebars than on drop bars.
So, Reid cautions that we must learn that--as Richard Ballantine argued in his 1972 book--"bikeways" alone are not alone the answer. For one thing, it's much better to take lanes and streets from vehicular traffic and to raise awareness of cyclists, pedestrians and motorists alike of cyclists' right to ride. So are bikes that are suited to the riders' needs and inclinations. Otherwise, a lot of the bikes purchased today will be hanging in rafters--or buried in landfills--by 2030.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)