11 February 2025

“Kittie” Knox

 February is Black History Month in the U.S. In years past, I’ve recounted the life and accomplishments of Major Taylor (which I may re-visit this month), a Black cycling brigade and other stories related to the experiences of African-descended cyclists in America. Today, however, I want to call attention to someone who has been all but forgotten, save by a few African American history scholars.




Katherine Towle “Kittie” Knox was born on 7 October 1874 in Cambridgeport, Massachusetts. When she was seven, her father died. Shortly afterward, her mother moved with her and her brother to the West End of Boston, a largely impoverished neighborhood that many American Blacks and immigrants called home.

She would work as a seamstress and her brother as a steamfitter. In addition to helping her family, her work allowed her to save money and buy a bicycle, which was a “big ticket” item. Her job also helped her to create a unique, and sometimes controversial, identity.

Ms. Knox came of age just as the first American bicycle boom was building up steam. And the Boston area was one of its epicenters. Kittie’s enthusiasm and talent were quickly noticed, and she was invited to participate in races and other events—and to become a member of the League of American Wheelmen (now known as the League of American Cyclists) in 1893.

In one of cycling’s more shameful episodes, one year after Knox became a member, the L.A.W. amended its constitution to mandate that only White cyclists could join. Disputes about Kittie’s membership ensued. She did not give in to pressure to resign and the amendment was not retroactive. “Kittie” Knox thus remained a member and a popular rider in its—and other—events.

But her popularity didn’t shield her from the “double whammy” of race and gender discrimination. Even as a card-carrying L.A.W. member, she was denied entry to races and other rides. And she was refused service in hotels and restaurants.  A newspaper account from 1895 describes an all-too-typical incident:





Asbury Park, New Jersey was a fashionable beach town and the site of a prestigious race. That newspaper account offers a glimpse into its troubled racial history. It’s a morning’s or afternoon’s bike ride from where I lived during my high-school years. Whenever I rode through that part of the Jersey Shore, I couldn’t help but to notice how I was pedaling from White to Black, or back, when I entered or left the city, which was ravaged by a race riot in 1970. And neighboring Ocean Grove was a “sundown town.” Both municipalities, like my high school town, are part of Monmouth County—which, according to some sources, had the largest Ku Klux Klan membership of any county north of the Mason-Dixon Line.

The newspaper account of that time also highlights, if unintentionally, the other “prong” of discrimination she faced. The “pretty colored girl from Boston” used the skills she acquired as a seamstress to create outfits that, in addition to allowing more freedom of movement than typical women’s cycling attire of the time, had a distinctive look. So, even when she won a race, reporters and much of the public focused on her appearance rather than her aptitude or hard work.

Unfortunately, not enough has changed. I can recall sports journalists and commentators tamping their praise of Serena Williams’ other-worldly tennis playing with criticisms of her inability to conform to their ideas of femininity.  Rebecca Twigg probably made more money from modeling clothes than from winning a rainbow jersey. And, for all of her dominance on the basketball court, much of the media and public seem more infatuated with Caitlin Clark's Midwestern “girl next door” persona.

Given what I’ve just said, it’s interesting and possibly disturbing to think of what her post-racing life could have been like. Would she have kept the flame of American cycling alive after World War I? Could she have become a fashion designer or created a line of clothing for athletic women? Or would she have been part of the “Harlem Renaissance,” whether on-site or in spirit?  We’ll never know because she died on 11 October 1900–four days after turning 26–from liver disease.



09 February 2025

08 February 2025

What Caused This Head-On Crash?

 A few days ago, I wrote about the fight to re-open Mount Tamalpais to cyclists.  In it, I mentioned my experience of pedaling up l’Alpe d’Huez, with its 21 virages (hairpin turns). I have also cycled in other mountainous areas in Europe and the US.

Mountain areas tend to be sparsely populated which, of course, is part of their appeal: It’s possible to enjoy peace and beautiful scenery without intrusions of noise and clutter. The relative abundance of human habitation, however, means that there are fewer roads: In some places, there’s only one route from one city or town to the next.  And those roads might be narrow and, like the one up the Alpe d’Huez, full of twists and turns.

Such a trajectory means that it’s often difficult, or even impossible, to see an oncoming vehicle.   Also, many such roads, whether they’re two- or four-lane, were built at a time when people drove smaller vehicles, or even before the advent of motorized transportation. So, even on a road with a “shoulder,” there’s barely a mountain goat hair’s breadth between a cyclist and a passing SUV.

Or one that’s coming from the opposite direction. I couldn’t help but to wonder whether that was the scenario that led to Kevin Carter’s death in what was described as a “head on collision.”  The comments that followed the YouTube video included some of the usual victim-blaming that follows such a tragedy: Some believed that Carter riding on the center line or in the wrong lane; others blamed him, an experienced cyclist, for taking too many risks or not enough precautions. Still others wondered why he was cycling in the first place.




Even with the challenges of driving and cycling I enumerated at the beginning of this post, I can’t help but to wonder how much the crash had to do with law enforcement and planners’ disregard for cyclists’ safety—and their assumption that drivers have more rights than anyone else on the road.