We were conversing the other night, my mother and I. We talked about the usual things: family, the weather, things that are and aren’t the way we remember them. Her doctor visits and stroll on the boardwalk, my bike ride that day, to Connecticut—and my recent trip to Greece. Oh, and we said a thing or two about the state of the world. That the weekend marked the 50th anniversary of Woodstock came up. She saw some footage of it on TV, she said, and became wistful. “You know, I would’ve liked to be part of something like that. All of those people, and they all girls along and had a good time.” She wouldn’t have wanted to partake of the drugs—she’s never done such things. I pointed out that there were indeed intoxicating substances consumed, but among half a million attendees, there must have been at least a few people who didn’t “toke” or “drop”.
Of course, she could no more have made the trek than I could’ve: “I had four young kids”—one of them being, of course, yours truly.
As with the Stonewall Rebellion, which happened a few weeks earlier, a lot of mythology and misconception surrounds what one commentator has called “the world’s first viral event.” (Interestingly, ARPANET, the predecessor of the Internet, was getting started around the same time.). But from what I’ve seen, heard and read, my mother’s perception about the camaraderie of Woodstock is accurate: According to police and civilian reports, there were no reports of violence. Also, there were only two overdoses reported.
On the other hand, one of the major misconceptions about the event is it’s location: It wasn’t in the town of Woodstock. The name came from the company that organized the event, which was actually held nearly 40 miles away from the fabled Catskills ‘burg.
I’ve been there three times, twice on bicycle tours of the area. There’s lots of lovely riding up that way and, not surprisingly, the area is well-served by bike shops.
The upstate New York haven is far from the only town called “Woodstock.” Every US State seems to have one and many seem to have more than their share of cyclists—and bike shops.
Here is a bike that would look out of place in any Woodstock—actual, historical, mythical or otherwise.
That was the age of hope. No more grey geriatric fossils grinding us down with their governance. That didn't last long...
ReplyDeleteWe've all seen the pictures of hippies caught in 5-mile-long traffic jams, snoozing on car hoods or dragging their sleeping bags through the mud. However, I've never seen photos of cyclists on their way to or from Woodstock. After all, this was smack dab in the middle of the 60s-70s Bike Boom. One would think some Woodstock attendees saw the benefit of pedaling their Raleigh or Peugeot to the event.
ReplyDeleteMT—I, too, have noticed the lack of cyclists and cycling in Woodstock documentation. Perhaps I’m wrong, but I have had the impression that the US Bike Boom was just beginning around that time
DeleteColine--Although I was a kid at the time, I feel nostalgic for it.
ReplyDelete