Anybody who's been cycling in New York for a decade or more knows that riding this city's streets is much different now from how it was then.
The most obvious changes are the bike lanes--which were all but nonexistent in the early 2000s--and, of course, Citibike. Also, there are purely and simply more people riding--and, as I've recounted in other posts, I encounter other cyclists while riding along streets and in neighborhoods where, not so long ago, I would be the only person on a bike.
As I've also discussed in other posts, I don't think the changes have necessarily made this a better city for cyclists. Some of the lanes are poorly designed (a few lead to nowhere) and built. Perhaps even worse is that the building of bike lanes and installation of Citibike ports doesn't seem to have accompanied a reduction in motorized traffic. Streets can't be made any wider, so the bike lanes that run along major streets and avenues were created by blocking off one of the traffic lanes. That has led to more traffic congestion and greater tension between motorists and cyclists--and between cyclists themselves.
Some riders, most of whom wouldn't have been riding had the bike lanes not been built, are as rude and aggressive as some of the worst drivers I've seen. Years ago, I knew--at least by sight--most of the cyclists I'd see on a given day. Even if we didn't know each other by name, we looked out for each other: We signaled turns. We didn't cut each other off. We alerted each other to broken glass and other hazards. Today, it seems, a lot of the newbies are riding as if they have blinders on. And the ones who ride motorized and electric bikes are even worse!
So, even though I enjoyed the film I am including in this post, I do not share the view of filmmaker Clarence Eckerson Jr. that this city is more bike-friendly as a result of the changes it shows. Still, the film is interesting to watch because it visually chronicles some of the changes in the appearance as well as the rhythms of the Big Apple:
The most obvious changes are the bike lanes--which were all but nonexistent in the early 2000s--and, of course, Citibike. Also, there are purely and simply more people riding--and, as I've recounted in other posts, I encounter other cyclists while riding along streets and in neighborhoods where, not so long ago, I would be the only person on a bike.
As I've also discussed in other posts, I don't think the changes have necessarily made this a better city for cyclists. Some of the lanes are poorly designed (a few lead to nowhere) and built. Perhaps even worse is that the building of bike lanes and installation of Citibike ports doesn't seem to have accompanied a reduction in motorized traffic. Streets can't be made any wider, so the bike lanes that run along major streets and avenues were created by blocking off one of the traffic lanes. That has led to more traffic congestion and greater tension between motorists and cyclists--and between cyclists themselves.
Some riders, most of whom wouldn't have been riding had the bike lanes not been built, are as rude and aggressive as some of the worst drivers I've seen. Years ago, I knew--at least by sight--most of the cyclists I'd see on a given day. Even if we didn't know each other by name, we looked out for each other: We signaled turns. We didn't cut each other off. We alerted each other to broken glass and other hazards. Today, it seems, a lot of the newbies are riding as if they have blinders on. And the ones who ride motorized and electric bikes are even worse!
So, even though I enjoyed the film I am including in this post, I do not share the view of filmmaker Clarence Eckerson Jr. that this city is more bike-friendly as a result of the changes it shows. Still, the film is interesting to watch because it visually chronicles some of the changes in the appearance as well as the rhythms of the Big Apple:
