After you read what you're about to read, you might decide that you won't ever read this blog again. I understand.
Here goes: I was in Paris on the last day of the Tour de France. And I wasn't among the throngs that lined the Champs Elysees for the finish.
Why?, you ask. Well, for one thing I have a general aversion to being in crowds these days. I have stood along the world's second-most famous thoroughfare (after Broadway in NYC) on two other occasions for the finish of the race. I have also been on the side of the road, in other parts of France, where other stages of the Tour passed. I just don't get the same thrill about such things that I once did.
For another thing: I hardly ever attend sporting events anymore. It's not that I don't like sports: I once wrote about them for a newspaper. Rather, I am not crazy about the way many different sports, from baseball to basketball to bicycle racing, have devolved. Too much is decided, I feel, by drugs and other kinds of technology, compared to events past.
Which brings me to my final point: This Tour, like the past few, didn't have the storylines of Tours past. Even when everyone expected Eddy Mercx, Bernard Hinault or Miguel Indurain to win (as they usually did), they could generate more drama than any of the current riders.
Finally, I just cannot bear to watch Chris Froome. I don't have anything against him winning: He's worked hard and, as far as anybody knows, hasn't used drugs. But he is the most awkward-looking rider I've ever seen at the front of a major race. As long as no one can prove he's cheated, I have no problem with his winning the Tour. But that doesn't mean I have to watch him.
So, after filling myself up at the hotel's breakfast buffet, instead of going to the Tour, I got a (relatively) early start on a gorgeous morning and found myself pedaling streets that were all but deserted--even in places as popular with tourists (or heavily used by delivery drivers) as the Boulevard St. Michel, St. Germain des Pres and Trocadero. I really felt--to borrow a cliche--that Paris belonged to me.
But, most important of all, I spent the afternoon and early evening with one of my friends, the man she married last year and a friend of theirs who was very friendly toward me.
As I mentioned in earlier posts, Michele and I had not seen each other in a number of years before I saw her last August, in this city. She was just a few weeks away from marrying the man who is now her husband. I saw her again in New York in May, with her husband Alec, near the end of their belated honeymoon trip.
An old Italian proverb says that a good meal can keep a person content for a week. I tend to agree with that. I'd say the same for a good bike ride or a few other things (some of which can't be mentioned on a PG-13 blog ;-) ). And, as much as I love good food and writing, as well as cycling, i can't help but to think that nothing can keep me happy longer than a good time with an old friend.
Here goes: I was in Paris on the last day of the Tour de France. And I wasn't among the throngs that lined the Champs Elysees for the finish.
Why?, you ask. Well, for one thing I have a general aversion to being in crowds these days. I have stood along the world's second-most famous thoroughfare (after Broadway in NYC) on two other occasions for the finish of the race. I have also been on the side of the road, in other parts of France, where other stages of the Tour passed. I just don't get the same thrill about such things that I once did.
For another thing: I hardly ever attend sporting events anymore. It's not that I don't like sports: I once wrote about them for a newspaper. Rather, I am not crazy about the way many different sports, from baseball to basketball to bicycle racing, have devolved. Too much is decided, I feel, by drugs and other kinds of technology, compared to events past.
Which brings me to my final point: This Tour, like the past few, didn't have the storylines of Tours past. Even when everyone expected Eddy Mercx, Bernard Hinault or Miguel Indurain to win (as they usually did), they could generate more drama than any of the current riders.
Finally, I just cannot bear to watch Chris Froome. I don't have anything against him winning: He's worked hard and, as far as anybody knows, hasn't used drugs. But he is the most awkward-looking rider I've ever seen at the front of a major race. As long as no one can prove he's cheated, I have no problem with his winning the Tour. But that doesn't mean I have to watch him.
So, after filling myself up at the hotel's breakfast buffet, instead of going to the Tour, I got a (relatively) early start on a gorgeous morning and found myself pedaling streets that were all but deserted--even in places as popular with tourists (or heavily used by delivery drivers) as the Boulevard St. Michel, St. Germain des Pres and Trocadero. I really felt--to borrow a cliche--that Paris belonged to me.
But, most important of all, I spent the afternoon and early evening with one of my friends, the man she married last year and a friend of theirs who was very friendly toward me.
As I mentioned in earlier posts, Michele and I had not seen each other in a number of years before I saw her last August, in this city. She was just a few weeks away from marrying the man who is now her husband. I saw her again in New York in May, with her husband Alec, near the end of their belated honeymoon trip.
An old Italian proverb says that a good meal can keep a person content for a week. I tend to agree with that. I'd say the same for a good bike ride or a few other things (some of which can't be mentioned on a PG-13 blog ;-) ). And, as much as I love good food and writing, as well as cycling, i can't help but to think that nothing can keep me happy longer than a good time with an old friend.