In the middle of the journey of my life, I am--as always--a woman on a bike. Although I do not know where this road will lead, the way is not lost, for I have arrived here. And I am on my bicycle, again.
Many of us ride with cute little "bike purses" tucked under, or between, the rails of our saddles. In them, we might carry a spare inner tube, patches, a small multi-tool and, depending on the size of the "purse", a mini-pump and/or cell phone and/or wallet. There are larger versions of such "purses", including "banana" bags of the kind popularized by Gilles Berthoud and others, and small versions of boxier saddle bags, like the X-Small Saddle Sack from Rivendell. And, of course there are larger saddle bags like those from Carradice made in sizes to carry what you need for a day or weekend trip, or even camping gear. Carradice's Camper Longflap almost seems to have been an exercise in carrying as much as possible without using panniers and an expedition-style rack. Of course, when some people ponder the question of "how much" they can carry under their saddles, they are not talking about volume in liters or cubic inches or whatever. Instead, they are talking about "street value."
At least, that seemed to be the case for 37-year-old Mohamed Mohmoud Charara, who lived with his parents in Windsor, Ontario, Canada. He kept his bike in a common stairwell area where other residents of his building kept their bikes. It seems, though, that he wasn't using his wheels to get around the city just across the river from Detroit. He wasn't even using it to conduct business. Instead, he serviced his clients from a black Escalade SUV parked outside the building. The bike was just for storage. And what did he keep under the seat? Well, when he was busted, city constables found 24.7 grams of crack cocaine and 13.2 grams of powder cocaine. Together, they had a street value of almost $3800. The cops also seized a few things Charara couldn't keep under his bike seat, like a digital scale, other drug paraphenalia, an iPhone (well, with the right bag, he could have kept it on his bike) and $1695 cash. What if he'd tried to use that bike as a getaway vehicle? Would he have ended up like this guy?
Some time in your childhood, you probably had, at least once, the sort of teacher who punished everyone in your class for something one kid did. That, I believe, is the sort of teacher Donald Trump would have been had he pursued the life of an educator. At least, that is what I believe after seeing one of his latest threats. If he acts on it, some $11.5 billion in goods from the EU could be subject to retaliatory tariffs. Among those items are hubs and sprockets.
So why does El Cheeto Grande want to slap punitive taxes on wheel goods and gears? Well, he rationalizes this threat with a World Trade Organization ruling from last May, which found that Airbus had received illegal subsidies from European countries and gave the US the right to impose retaliatory tariffs. What he didn't mention, however, is a more recent WTO ruling, specifically from last month: Boeing, which just happens to be Airbus's main rival, received similarly illegal tax breaks in the US. Thus, said the WTO, the EU can impose sanctions on imports from the US. Now, I thought really hard about why freewheels, cassettes and hubs for bicycles--or motorcycle hubs or sprockets--are targeted for tariffs that are supposed to punish Europeans for supporting their aerospace industry. All I could come up was this: Aircraft have wheels, which use hubs. And their engines use gears, i.e., sprockets. So, perhaps, anything that could potentially help an A-380 take off, fly or land is fair game for new taxes. Hmm...I'm not sure that works. I must say I tried, really tried, to understand the logic of the threat. But then I remembered: This is Donald Trump we're talking about.
Yesterday was Tax Day in the US. Except for those who are getting big refunds, nobody was happy. Some of us look for good news on the day. Alas, not much was to be found. Two items made the woes of owing (and, yes, I was one of the people who owed--thank you, Donald!) trivial in comparison. One of those stories is happening here in the US. "Retrogrouch" confirmed rumors that I'd heard for some time: Rebecca Twigg, one of the greatest American female cyclists--actually, one of the greatest American cyclists--is homeless. She doesn't even have a bicycle anymore. Of course, it's tragic for anyone to live on the streets, with only ragged blankets, large garbage bags and, if he or she is lucky, a refrigerator box, to protect him or her from cold, wind and rain, along with the dirt and other hazards imposed by other humans. And Rebecca is not the first elite athlete or other celebrity to end up with nothing of her own and nowhere home. But her story is especially disturbing because, if you were around during the '80's and '90's, you recall her as someone who "had everything going for her". Her Olympic medals and other victories brought her endorsement contracts; her looks generated modeling gigs and her intelligence (and hard work) got her into college at age 14. From the moment she got on a bike as a toddler, she says, she knew she was "born to" ride. And she exercised that birthright, if you will, to its fullest: She was as fiercely competitive as she is talented. Most of us envy people who find their "calling", if you will, before they can even call it that: the painter who knew he would be creating his life on canvas at age 5; the teacher who knew she'd spend her life in the classroom when she was even younger than the kids she's teaching now; the doctor whose vocation was revealed to him not long after he learned how to read. I have known that painter and doctor, both of whom are gone now, and the teacher is a friend who just happens to be granddaughter of my friend Mildred. Having such a clear vision of their lives at such an early age helped all of them: They knew what they needed to do and focused on it. One difference between them and Rebecca, though, is that they found themselves in professions they could practice for their entire working lives (or, in the case of the painter, his entire life). None of them (except for the teacher, if she decides to change careers) will ever have to experience something Rebecca, and many other professional athletes, had to endure: a transition from a life of days structured around sport to the daily routines of a "normal" job or career. In Rebecca's case, that career was in Information Technology. She studied it (Computer Science) at Colman College after earning a bachelor's degree in Biology at the University of Washington. There are people who love that kind of work; others, like Stuart--the Australian fellow with whom I rode in Cambodia--hated it. I don't know whether Rebecca disliked the work per se or whether she simply couldn't abide being in an office and at a desk. In any case, in spite of her talent and hard work, she seemed to have difficulty in holding down jobs. Or, perhaps, her trouble came because of her talent and hard work: She may have simply felt that there was no "victory" at the end of it. The prospect of not "winning" may also be a reason why she finds it so difficult to accept help. Perhaps doing so would be an admission of defeat for her. Also, bicycle racers tend to be rather solitary figures, and even in that world, racers like Rebecca are rather like monks: Her best event, after all, was the 3000 meter individual pursuit race. Anyway, I hope her story turns into something better. I hope the same for la Cathedrale de Notre Dame in Paris. At least the people in charge of it are already getting, and accepting help in rebuilding after the awful fire it incurred yesterday. My friend Michele and I exchanged e-mails about the news. Les francaises sont tres choques--The French are very shocked, she wrote. To which I replied: Tout le monde est choque. La cathedrale est un tresor du monde--The whole world is shocked. The cathedral is a treasure of the world. I mean, what building besides the Eiffel Tower and, perhaps, the Sacre Coeur de Montmartre, is more embematic of the City of Light? I still recall, during my second day in Paris (more years ago than I'll admit), sitting in the square by the Notre Dame and listening to the bell on a warm June day. I felt like I'd become, at that moment, part of a city that has become so much a part of me: New York is the only city I know better. At least it seems that more of the cathedral can be saved than officials originally thought. President Macron has vowed to rebuild it, and wealthy magnates as well as more anonymous citizens are already donating money. However the work is done, the real restoration will not be on the structures themselves: Rather, it will be a healing of the minds and spirits that have been so moved by its grandeur, the light coruscating through its stained-glass windows or the views from its towers--or simply by images of those towers, windows and the spire. Sir Kenneth Clark, often called the high priest of Art History, once said that he could not define "civilization" in abstract terms. But, as he turned to the Notre Dame in his famous "Civilization" series, he declared, "I know I'm looking at it." For me, a non-religious person, that's reason enough to care about the Notre Dame. Taxes are just a pimple on the face of my life, which is part of the multitude which, I hope, have helped to contribute in whatever small ways to civilization or "the human project" or whatever you want to call it.
The past couple of mornings began with mist that turned to fog at the ocean.
I don't know whether this is what the Ramones had in mind when they sang about Rockaway Beach. I like it, actually: The shadowy figures on the jetty were as clear to me as a dream, and I felt myself opening like a leaf on a bush that would soon flower.
The weather and traffic reports warned of poor visibility. But I had no trouble seeing.
Well, I could see clearly enough to know that Point Lookout would not live up to its name: It wasn't possible to look out very far from there.
But I could still see clearly, the way we can on an invigorating ride.
Having worked as a bike mechanic, I know the importance of having the right tool for the job. There are some situations, though, when you just don't have it. So what do you do?
