I think it was Winston Churchill who said that Americans will do the right thing after they've exhausted all other possibilities.
Sometimes I think he was an optimist, at least when it comes to laws and polices regarding bicycles. In my own humble (OK, I gotta say that: I know I'm right because...well, I'm so damn smart and I've been riding for almost half a century!) opinion, no vehicle--whether it has one, two, three, four or more wheels--with a motor should be allowed in any lane designated for pedestrians, pedaled bicycles or any vehicle that doesn't have a motor.
I've presented my wisdom, I mean, opinion to everyone from the folks at Transportation Alternatives (of which I'm a member) to City Hall. The response is almost always the same: "You're right. But how could it be enforced?"
So, we have to contend with "rocket" scooters, e-bikes with boosters, and hand-throttle e-bikes in bike lanes that are six feet wide--for bike traffic in both directions. Or, in some places, we and pedestrians are "protected" by wrongheaded regulations.
The new year will begin with such a policy for folks who cross the Golden Gate Bridge. Starting on 1 January, there will be a one-size-fits-all 15 MPH speed limit in the bike/pedestrian lane. Currently, bridge-crossers are "advised" to remain within that limit.
Photo by Sherry LaVars, for the Marin Independent Journal |
While I understand the concerns of pedestrians (having walked across a number of bridges, including the Triborough/RFK and Queensborough/59th Street, in bike-ped lanes), I can also say that most cyclists who are going more than 15 MPH have a commensurate level of handling skills. The same cannot be said, I believe, for folks riding e-bikes and motorized bikes and scooters at 25 or 30 MPH. Plus, a motorized bike (which, as often as not, is really just a scaled-down motorcycle) can inflict more serious injury or damage than a pedaled bicycle at any given speed.
My hope is that Churchill will be proven right and whoever came up with the new Golden Gate Bridge regulation will realize the error of it and come up with something more sensible--like, say, banning anything with a motor from the pedestrian/bike lane.
I could see it as sensible if restricted to Class 1 e-bikes, though I am not sure it should be. I think I would statistics before making that call.
ReplyDelete