Today is Election Day here in the US.
Showing posts with label Election Day. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Election Day. Show all posts
05 November 2024
03 November 2020
A Free Ride Ahead of Vanilla ISIS
Today is Election Day here in the US.
In case you're wondering: Yes, I voted--a month ago. On the first of October--the same day I got my flu shot--I rode my bike to the Queens County Board of Elections and delivered my absentee ballot. I didn't want to take any chances with mail delays or any of the potential hazards (COVID-19, voter intimidation) of waiting in line at the poll site.
Speaking of riding to vote: Roam NRV, the bike share company of New River Valley, Virginia (home of, among other things, Virginia Tech University), is offering free rides today. According to Roam NRV operations manager Cat Woodson, the Roam NRV the goal of the offer, dubbed "Rolls to the Polls, is to "minimize friction points" in getting to the voting place. "Maybe instead of taking two bus trips, it takes one bus trip and a bike ride or maybe it is a little bit of a walk and a bike trip," she explains. The bike ride, for many, would cut down on the amount of time--and, perhaps more important, hassles--associated with getting to the polling spot.
I wholly endorse Roam NRV's action. I don't, however, openly endorse candidates (Yeah, right!). So please don't try to infer my polling choices from this video:
07 November 2017
He's Not Running For Office: He's Pedaling For The Vote
Why do political candidates "run" for office?
That's a question David John Wilson might ask.
He is one of 16 candidates on the ballot for the mayoralty of Minneapolis, the city that gave us Prince and launched the career of Hubert Humphrey. It's perhaps no surprise that in such a city a candidate--namely Wilson--could run on a "Rainbows Butterflies Unicorns" ticket.
Also not surprising--especially considering that Minneapolis is perennially rated as one of the most bicycle-friendly cities in the US, and even the world--is that Wilson is conducting his campaign from, if not the seat of his pants, then the saddle of his bicycle.
Most days during his campaign, he has dressed like a unicorn, complete with horns--and American flags. He calls this persona, if you will, "Votey McVoteface." He has alternate costumes as well, including one of George Washington. But, not surprisingly, it's Votey that gets him the most attention.
Creating Votey, and coming up with his platform, was a way of appropriating a term of derision, in much the way young blacks call each other the "n" word or gay man refer to each other, and sometimes themselves, as "faggots". (Proponents of "queer studies" claim that they are appropriating the "q" word in a similar way.) Wilson says he's often heard the phrase "rainbows, unicorns and butterflies" used to mock people who express ideas and points of view that are progressive, or merely different.
At the start of the campaign, he pledged to ride 1000 miles around the city as Votey. He admits that he has no chance of winning the election. The purpose of his campaign, he explains, is to "make a difference" by helping to increase voter turnout and getting young people interested in politics: things he couldn't do in years past, when he worked at the polls.
"I would like to dream that I could be mayor but that's not really what this is about," he says. "This is about getting out the vote, this is about embracing the city that I love."
In other words, it's not about the destination; it's about the journey: the way of a cyclist.
That's a question David John Wilson might ask.
He is one of 16 candidates on the ballot for the mayoralty of Minneapolis, the city that gave us Prince and launched the career of Hubert Humphrey. It's perhaps no surprise that in such a city a candidate--namely Wilson--could run on a "Rainbows Butterflies Unicorns" ticket.
Also not surprising--especially considering that Minneapolis is perennially rated as one of the most bicycle-friendly cities in the US, and even the world--is that Wilson is conducting his campaign from, if not the seat of his pants, then the saddle of his bicycle.
Most days during his campaign, he has dressed like a unicorn, complete with horns--and American flags. He calls this persona, if you will, "Votey McVoteface." He has alternate costumes as well, including one of George Washington. But, not surprisingly, it's Votey that gets him the most attention.
Creating Votey, and coming up with his platform, was a way of appropriating a term of derision, in much the way young blacks call each other the "n" word or gay man refer to each other, and sometimes themselves, as "faggots". (Proponents of "queer studies" claim that they are appropriating the "q" word in a similar way.) Wilson says he's often heard the phrase "rainbows, unicorns and butterflies" used to mock people who express ideas and points of view that are progressive, or merely different.
At the start of the campaign, he pledged to ride 1000 miles around the city as Votey. He admits that he has no chance of winning the election. The purpose of his campaign, he explains, is to "make a difference" by helping to increase voter turnout and getting young people interested in politics: things he couldn't do in years past, when he worked at the polls.
"I would like to dream that I could be mayor but that's not really what this is about," he says. "This is about getting out the vote, this is about embracing the city that I love."
In other words, it's not about the destination; it's about the journey: the way of a cyclist.
08 November 2016
Vote Bike!
Today is Election Day here in the US.
I believe I have heard, "Did you vote?" and "Who did you vote for?" (or "Who are you going to vote for?") more often today than I heard during the last few elections combined.
The talking heads are right when they describe this year's election as an "enigma" or "paradox": It's been a long time since so many people have paid attention, even though this year's major party candidates for the Presidency are the least-liked, and possibly the worst, in the history of this country.
I'm not sure that choosing one candidate over the other will make much difference for cycling in this country, so I suspect most cyclists will vote by the same criteria other voters use. Perhaps Hillary Clinton will be somewhat better, simply because she is somewhat better on environmental issues, which is a bit like saying that any given country is a little better than Saudi Arabia on women's rights. At least one can hope that Hillary's attention to issues such as greenhouse gases and mass transit might translate into policies, or even infrastructure, that will benefit cyclists. On the other hand, you can pretty much bet that a man who thinks global warming is a hoax perpetrated by the Chinese will do nothing favorable to cyclists.
That is not to say that there's nothing at stake for cyclists or cycling in this election. The biggest differences that voters can make in creating bicycle policy and infrastructure are found at the local level. So, elections for city councils, county and state legislatures as well as other local offices, some of which are being held today, can be a key to creating more "bike friendly" areas in the US.
To my knowledge, though, no major US media outlet has done anything like the "scorecard" The Guardian did in advance of last year's general election in Great Britain. In it, each of the major parties is rated on a scale from one to ten in terms of its attention, or lack thereof, to cycling-related issues. Perhaps not surprisingly, the UK Independence Party (the one that led the "Brexit"vote) scored zero, while the Greens scored ten.
Can you imagine the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Washington Post or other newspapers rating the Republicans, Democrats, Libertarians, Greens or other parties--or, better yet, each of the candidates, especially during the Primaries. Hmm...How would Jill Stein or Bernie Sanders compare to Ted Cruz or Donald Trump?
I believe I have heard, "Did you vote?" and "Who did you vote for?" (or "Who are you going to vote for?") more often today than I heard during the last few elections combined.
The talking heads are right when they describe this year's election as an "enigma" or "paradox": It's been a long time since so many people have paid attention, even though this year's major party candidates for the Presidency are the least-liked, and possibly the worst, in the history of this country.
I'm not sure that choosing one candidate over the other will make much difference for cycling in this country, so I suspect most cyclists will vote by the same criteria other voters use. Perhaps Hillary Clinton will be somewhat better, simply because she is somewhat better on environmental issues, which is a bit like saying that any given country is a little better than Saudi Arabia on women's rights. At least one can hope that Hillary's attention to issues such as greenhouse gases and mass transit might translate into policies, or even infrastructure, that will benefit cyclists. On the other hand, you can pretty much bet that a man who thinks global warming is a hoax perpetrated by the Chinese will do nothing favorable to cyclists.
That is not to say that there's nothing at stake for cyclists or cycling in this election. The biggest differences that voters can make in creating bicycle policy and infrastructure are found at the local level. So, elections for city councils, county and state legislatures as well as other local offices, some of which are being held today, can be a key to creating more "bike friendly" areas in the US.
 |
| Flag of the Samajwadi Party, India |
To my knowledge, though, no major US media outlet has done anything like the "scorecard" The Guardian did in advance of last year's general election in Great Britain. In it, each of the major parties is rated on a scale from one to ten in terms of its attention, or lack thereof, to cycling-related issues. Perhaps not surprisingly, the UK Independence Party (the one that led the "Brexit"vote) scored zero, while the Greens scored ten.
Can you imagine the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Washington Post or other newspapers rating the Republicans, Democrats, Libertarians, Greens or other parties--or, better yet, each of the candidates, especially during the Primaries. Hmm...How would Jill Stein or Bernie Sanders compare to Ted Cruz or Donald Trump?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)